Culture
now browsing by category
New trend of Cambodia political harassment from NEC to Party
Political Paradigm of Pragmatism from the Khmer Youth part 103
This part (103), Mr. Sophan articulated on the upcoming election of Cambodia: is it will be free and fair, prudent or controversial?
As observed, previous elections, the government-led party CPP focused on “game at play” with National Election Committee (NEC), but this year, it has been outstanding for government-led party CPP that has focused on dismantling key opposition party CNRP.
This new trend is a new political landscape and development of Cambodia.
IPU Solution on Cambodia 2017
IPU Solution on Cambodia 2017
ហេតុអ្វីអ្នកដែលជាតំណាងកម្ពុជាដ៏មានកិត្តិយសបានលើកយកខ្មែរក្រហមជាកម្មវត្ថុនយោបាយដើម្បីធ្វើទុក្ខបុកម្នេញកម្ពុជា? អារម្មណ៌របស់គេអាចកំពុងច្របូកច្របល់យ៉ាងប្រត្យក្រឬគាត់មានអ្វីជាល្បិចសំងាត់ដើម្បីធ្វើអោយកម្ពុជាប្រព្រឹត្តអំពើហឹង្សាដាក់គ្នាទៅវិញទៅមក ជាពិសេសទាក់ទាញមេដឹកនាំណាដែលយកអំពើហឹង្សាជាយានដើម្បីធ្វើទុក្ខបុកម្នេញដល់ប្រជាជនកម្ពុជា។ ខ្ញុំគិតថា ជីវិតនយោបាយរបស់ពួកគាត់ដែលយកគោលការណ៌ប្រឈមមុខស្លាប់រស់ និងជ្រុលនិយមជាគោល ទាំងអស់នេះគឺហួសសម័យហើយ។ អ្នកទាំងពីរបានបាត់បង់ការគោរពនៅក្នុងអង្គប្រជុំដោយវិធីជ្រុលនិយមរបស់ពួកគាត់។ តាមរយៈអាកប្បកិរិយាជ្រុលរបស់ពួកគាត់ មិនមែនតែអ្នកពីរទេដែលគេសើចចំអកដាក់ ប្រទេសកម្ពុជាទាំងមូលត្រូវបានគេសើចចំអកដាក់ផងដែរ។
កំណត់ចំណាំ៖ ចំឡើយរបស់អាយភីយូបញ្ជាក់ច្បាស់ហើយថា អាយភីយូមិនអាចងាកទៅរកអតីតកាលទេ អាយភីយូកំពុងដោះស្រាយបញ្ហាបច្ចុប្បន្ននិងអនាគត។
Courtesy: Newsnextbd
Why the persons who are prestigiously representing Cambodia picked up the Khmer Rouge political commodity to inflict the Khmer people? His mind must be so paranoid or he has his hidden agenda to draw violence among Khmer people especially to drag those violence-based political leader(s) to continue inflicting Cambodian people. I think their political career of confrontational approach, and extremism, all are out of date. The dual is experienced dishonoured in the meeting by their own radical approach. Through their radical behaviour, not the dual only is laughed at, but the whole Cambodia.
Government’s rebuttal to Human Rights Report on Cambodia by the US is out of common sense
Political Analysis:
“when one is out of common sense, one is likely chasing their own shadow without knowing the shadow’s owner” – Anonymous
U.S. Department of State through its Diplomacy in Action has always released situations of human rights and democracy for many countries around the world annually. This 2016, with its tittle “Country Reports on Human Rights Practice 2016: Cambodia“, the reports echoed to its 2015 reports on seventh different sections such as respecting for the integrity of the person including freedom from arbitrary deprivation of life and other unlawful or politically motivated killings etc. by exposing the killing of Dr. Kem Ley and its distrustful legal investigation to punish the real perpetrator(s) as well as arbitrary arrest and detention by exposing several arbitrary arrests, pretrial detention, and denial of fair public trial etc.
This descriptive report is common sense to all Cambodian people and its report is based on NGOs’ reports in Cambodia. But this type of report is not void from a strong political rebuttal from the government, especially through her human rights department (please listen to spokesperson HE Kata Uon by RFI Khmer), without accepting the report to improve their work performance, the rebuttal is critical to deny and to defend themselves from any wrongdoings. Actually, there are many points to be learnt from the report. And the accusation that such report is the violation over Cambodia’s sovereignty is impregnably baseless. By looking at the regular conducts of the report and the nature of the report which was seems to re-organize information collected from annual database released by local NGOs in Cambodia, they are common sense that has been nationwide conveyed by Cambodian people. The rebuttal is likely opposing to such common sense perceived by the Cambodian people.
The spokesperson highly talked about the professional and technical workmanship within the government especially within their human rights department, but the verbal rebuttal and refusal rhetoric is significantly highlighting its lack of common sense, professionalism, and technicality. Cambodian people are speechless and hopeless to this kind of government leadership performance. Cambodian people need concrete policy framework documenting within a credential report or publishing to read rather than through relentless verbal attacks to major outsiders’ reports. This is a country, not an autocratic plot of land.
#CambodiaLeadershipSkills
Cambodia’s bottom-line people have been negligent by the Royal Government
នេះជាទិដ្ឋភាពមួយក្នុងស្រុកចំការលើ ខេត្តកំពង់ចាម។ កាលនៅមធ្យមសិក្សា គ្រូបង្រៀនថាដើម្បីធ្វើអោយសេដ្ឋកិច្ចរីកចំរើន ជីវភាពប្រជាជនមានបានប្រកបដោយភាពថ្លៃថ្នូ ត្រូវផ្តោតទៅលើឧស្សាហកម្ម ដោយលើកឧទាហរណ៏អំពីដីក្រហមកំពង់ចាម ក្រចេះ រតនគីរី ស្ទឹងត្រែង និងមណ្ឌលគីរីជាដើម។ គ្រូប្រាប់ថាដំណាំកៅស៊ូខ្មែរលេខ១លើលោក។
ថ្ងៃនេះខ្ញុំឃើញជាក់ស្តែង។ ដំណាំកៅស៊ូខ្មែរក៏ដូចជាដំណាំស្រូវនៃកសិករខ្មែរ គឺស្ថិតនៅលើប្រភេទដំណាំជាលក្ខណះគ្រួសារនិងពឹងពាក់ទាំងស្រុងទៅលើមេឃ-ដី-ភ្លៀង តាមធម្មជាតិតែប៉ុណ្ណោះ។ ការដាំដុះតាមបែបប្រពៃណីទាំងផ្នែកឧស្សាហកម្ម និង កសិកម្មទាំងនេះមិនអាចរំដោះកម្ពុជាចេញពីភាពក្រីក្របានទេ។
១. បញ្ហាទី១ ប្រជាជនខ្វះចំណេះដឹងនិងធនធានហិរញ្ញវត្ថុ និយាយអោយចំគឺប្រជាជនខ្វះទីពឹងនិងជ្រោមជ្រែងពីខាងក្រៅជាពិសេសពីរាជរដ្នាភិបាល។
២. បញ្ហាទី២ គឺទីផ្សាយកម្ពុជាជាទីផ្សានាំចូល មិនមែនជាទីផ្សានាំចេញទេ។ ទំនិញកម្ពុជាមិនអាចប្រកួតប្រជែងជាមួយប្រទេសជិតខាងបានស្មើមុខស្មើមាត់សោះ ហើយផលិតសម្រាប់តំរូវការទីផ្សារក្នុងស្រុកក៏មិនកើតដែរ នៅពេលដែលក្រុមហ៊ុនធំៗក្នុងស្រុកមួយចំនួនធំចូលចិត្តនាំសម្ភារៈដើមក្រៅស្រុកមកប្រើ។ ទីផ្សាចង្អៀតណែនបែបនេះ រំពឹងអ្វីដល់ការលើកកំពស់ជីវភាពដល់អ្នកដាំស្រូវនិងអ្នកដាំកៅស៊ូ។
៣. បញ្ហាទី៣ គឺកម្ពុជាសំបូរទៅដោយមេដឹកនាំអួត ដូចជាអួតអំពីអង្គរវត្ត អួតអំពីសមិទ្ធិផលថ្មីៗដោយប្រៀបធៀបទៅនឹងសង្គ្រាមប្រល័យពូជសាសន៌ និងអួតអំពីផ្ទះវីឡា រថយន្តទំនើប និងអង្គរក្សអ្នកបម្រើឆ្វេងស្តាំរបស់ខ្លួន ដោយគ្រាន់តែរកទីផ្សារឬបង្កើតទីផ្សារ ឬបង្កើតធនាគារកំចីដោយយកការប្រាក់ទាបដល់អ្នកដាំស្រូវនិងអ្នកដាំកៅស៊ូមិនបានផង។ បើខ្ញុំជាមេដឹកនាំទទូលខុសត្រូវវិញ បើធ្វើប៉ុណ្ណេះមិនបាន ខ្ញុំជ្រមុជទឹកបាតពាងសំឡាប់ខ្លួនល្អជាង។
——
This a view of rubber plantation in Chamkar Leou district, Kampongcham. When I was in high school, teachers taught that if we want to uplift the livelihood of the Cambodian people, we must focus on industry by giving example of brown fertile lands in Kampongcham, Kratie, Ratanakiri, Stung Traeng, and Mondolkiri. They said Cambodia rubber is number one in the world.
Today, I am eyes-witnessing it. Cambodia rubber plantation is like rice-stalk plantation of Khmer farmers which are categorized in family harvesting and the growing is wholly depending on sky-soil-rain of this natural dependency. The crops depends on tradition like this couldn’t uplift Cambodian people from poverty.
1. First challenge: Cambodian people are shortcoming of knowledge and financing especially lacking external supports particularly the Royal Government of Cambodia.
2. Second challenge: Cambodia’s market is the import market, not export market. Cambodia’s products 
couldn’t compete with neighboring countries. To produce for domestic demand is irrelevant as well, as many giant companies prefer to import raw materials for its processing. This type of scarcity and squeezing space of Cambodia market, Cambodian rice farmers and rubber plant growers are hopeless to escape from poverty.
3. Third challenge: Cambodia is rich of bragging leaders such as bragging about the greatness of Angkor Wat, bragging about their new achievements by comparing them to that of genocidal regime, and bragging about their luxury cars, villas, and escorts-servants etc. If leaders couldn’t make market, or seek market, or create cheap interest loan (bank) for the rice farmers and rubber plant growers, those leaders should just soak head into bottom of water jar to commit suicide