Archives

now browsing by author

 
Posted by: | Posted on: April 7, 2018

Can Cambodia’s fractured opposition survive?

Can Cambodia’s fractured opposition survive?

 PHNOM PENH, APRIL 5, 2018 3:48 PM (UTC+8)

In America, where many former CNRP officials now find themselves in exile, members of each clique have shared platforms and speaking engagements.

Sam Rainsy and Kem Sokha have become figure of change against the status-quo of Hun Sen. The perpetual attempts of Hun Sen to divide them both has been in vain that leading to Hun Sen's aggressive paranoia to dissolve this party. The author must comprehend this moment that from what Hun Sen did in dissolving the CNRP, the unity and awareness have become greater and sounder in directing this force to bring back Cambodia's democracy, rule of laws, justice, wealth share fairness, social trust, and sustainable development.

Sam Rainsy and Kem Sokha have become figure of change against the status-quo of Hun Sen. The perpetual attempts of Hun Sen to divide them both has been in vain that leading to Hun Sen’s aggressive paranoia to dissolve this party. The author must comprehend this moment that from what Hun Sen did in dissolving the CNRP, the unity and awareness have become greater and sounder in directing this force to bring back Cambodia’s democracy, rule of laws, justice, wealth share fairness, social trust, and sustainable development.

“Is the spirit of the CNRP still alive? Of course it’s still alive. The CNRM intends to be a placeholder for when the CNRP is reconstituted,” says Sophal Ear, associate professor of diplomacy and world affairs at Occidental College at Los Angeles.

The Cambodia National Rescue Party – North America (CNRP-NA), composed of chapters from different American states, was formed after the HRP and SRP merged in 2012. It was formerly the SRP-NA.

But, in 2014, a number of members and state chapters, supposedly those loyal to the HRP, broke away to create the CNRP-USA. Today, this group appears to have remained loyal to those who want to remain under the CNRP banner.

But Phan Prak, a representative of the CNRP-USA, says the organization “is not against the CNRM nor have we ever supported it. The CNRP-USA respects an individual to exercise their rights to join any organizations as they wish.”

=====

While there are attempts by government-aligned media to portray divisions within the opposition as a sign of its feebleness, another interpretation is that internal disputes ought to be welcomed in any pro-democracy party or movement.

Indeed, a positive reading of current events is that voices ignored in the past are now being allowed to air their thoughts and grievances. Some political analysts think this is an opportunity for a younger generation of opposition figures to emerge.

“It is so important for the opposition party to have new blood in its leadership. Leaders in the opposition party should be the mentors for the new blood,” says Noan Sereiboth, a political blogger.

There are some indications that is happening. Kem Sokha’s eldest daughter, Kem Monovithya, 36, has been one of the most active and vocal figures, meeting with US senators last month and Japanese officials last week. She declined to comment for this article.

At the same time, analysts say there is the danger that if infighting continues there will only be one winner: Hun Sen. If fissures go unresolved then it would be the “nail in the coffin of the one formula that seemed to work: the creation of a unified opposition,” says academic Sophal Ear.

Continue to read this article in Asia Times…

Posted by: | Posted on: April 6, 2018

Cambodia clampdown was long in the planning

“When ‘color revolution’ requires 132 pages to explain and defend as the basis of anything, someone’s working overtime to turn it into an excuse or ploy to crack down on the opposition, NGOs, the media and government critics,” said Sophal Ear, an associate professor of diplomacy and world affairs at Occidental College in Los Angeles. “The metaphorical hammer is being used on their heads.”

Hun Manith, the second Hun Sen's Son and Military Intelligence Head is believed the instigator of creating "colour revolution" narrative to dissolve opposition aiming to win election that has no legitimacy. The colour revolution narrative is an excuse to maintain Hun Sen power in one-party state which is contradictory to the national Constitution.

Hun Manith, the second Hun Sen’s Son and Military Intelligence Head is believed the instigator of creating “colour revolution” narrative to dissolve opposition aiming to win election that has no legitimacy. The colour revolution narrative is an excuse to maintain Hun Sen power in one-party state which is contradictory to the national Constitution.

There was also the matter of a June 2017 local level commune elections that had the potential to build electoral momentum for the CNRP ahead of the national polls. The CNRP gained a strong foothold in the countryside, winning 5,000 seats. However, those and national level seats won in 2013 were given to smaller parties after the CNRP’s dissolution.

Hun Manith saw the commune elections as a potential springboard for an opposition uprising. “As you might be aware, this kind of regime change took place near and after an election, and Cambodia will have a commune election in 2017. Is it a coincidence?” he said in the 2016 interview.

“In order to succeed in mobilizing the people for regime change, they need to create a negative perception about the government, for locals and also in the international arena. Once the perspective succeeds, all the means and tactics for regime change will be justified.”

The CPP’s propaganda apparatus, including most notably the pro-government Fresh News outlet, was later mobilized to convince a skeptical public and an even more skeptical international audience that its moves against the opposition were warranted.

The Phnom Penh Post reported in March that Fresh News released a 700-page collection of open letters, commentary and political analysis spinning Cambodia’s recent political crackdown into a successful prevention of a color revolution.


Former Phnom Penh Post News Editor Sebastian Strangio, also the author of Hun Sen’s Cambodia, said Fresh News’ role was perhaps more important in shaping the news than it was in delivering it, saying “They don’t really do journalism.”

However, while the average Cambodian struggled to understand exactly what a color revolution was, Los Angeles-based academic and political analyst Sophal was under no illusions.

“The Cambodian people understand the term ‘color revolution’ insofar as it’s being used as a hammer swung on their friends’ heads, which is a whack-a-mole exercise that is more likely to result in their own heads being hit,” he told Asia Times.

“Some people are of course absorbing this and drinking the Kool Aid, but there’s also a sense that anything Fresh News and Khmer Times (newspaper) says is bad is actually good, and anything they say is good is actually bad.

“I never cease to be amazed at how smart Cambodians are at seeing through the fog. In a place where the Orwellian modus operandi that white is black and black is white prevails, Cambodians aren’t fooled for a second.”

While attempts to justify attacks on the CNRP continued and senior party members fled the country fearing arrest, the prime minister’s second son was promoted inside the military from Major General to Lieutenant General, recognition for his “good achievements”, including possibly his role in the successful suppression operation against the CNRP.

Continue to read by Asia Times….

Posted by: | Posted on: March 22, 2018

Joint Statement on the Human Rights Situation in Cambodia

Op-Ed: Geneva Switzerland

Item 2 General Debate
37th Session of the Human Rights Council
Geneva, March 21, 2018

Mr. President,

New Zealand 1New Zealand makes this statement on behalf of a group of 45 countries; the full version of the statement and the list of supporting delegations will be published on the extranet.

The international community has provided strong support for the development of democracy in Cambodia during the twenty-five years since the Constitution of Cambodia enshrined liberal multi-party democracy.  Over the intervening decades, we have applauded the progress Cambodia had made since the signing of the Paris Peace Agreements in 1991.  Positive indictors included a relatively successful national election in 2013, and communal elections in 2017.

As we near the elections scheduled for 29 July this year, our previous optimism has been replaced by deep concern about the recent serious decline of civil and political rights in Cambodia.  These backward steps include signs of escalating repression of the political opposition, civil society and media. We share the concerns highlighted by the High Commissioner and the Special Rapporteur about actions taken by the Cambodian government that will undermine the conduct of credible, free and fair elections in July.  For the Cambodian Government to retain its legitimacy, any elections must be free, fair and credible.

International human rights treaties ratified by Cambodia and the Constitution of Cambodia guarantee, and the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration affirms the rights of freedom of expression, freedom of association, and of citizens to participate in government through free, fair and credible elections that are periodic and transparent. However, we note with particular concern that in recent months:New Zealand 2

  • There has been a significant clampdown on the press and civil society across the country, including the closure or suspension of several NGOs and independent media companies;
  • The Cambodia National Rescue Party leader Kem Sokha was detained on 3 September 2017, and since then has been deprived of his rights including access to his lawyers, and the right to defend himself through legal assistance of his own choosing.
  • The court’s continued unwillingness to release Kem Sokha on bail during judicial proceedings is of concern especially in light of his deteriorating health.
  • The CNRP was dissolved by the Supreme Court on 16 November, 118 CNRP members were banned from political activity for five years, and the CNRP’s local and national seats were reallocated to unelected members of the ruling and other parties.

We are particularly concerned about the conditions under which opposition leader Kem Sokha is being detained following his arbitrary arrest: he is reportedly in isolation, without adequate access to health care, subjected to intrusive observation, and other conditions, such as constant light.  We call for the immediate release of all political prisoners, including Kem Sokha.

We urge Cambodia to:

  • Reinstate the CNRP and all elected members to their national and communal seats, and to
  • Repeal the amendments to the Law on Political Parties which provided for expansive grounds for the dissolution of political parties.

An electoral process from which the main democratic opposition party has been arbitrarily excluded cannot be considered genuine or legitimate.

We call on the Royal Government of Cambodia to take all measures necessary, before it is too late, to ensure that the 2018 elections are free, fair and credible.  In particular, we urge that the elections take place in a peaceful environment without threats, arbitrary arrests or acts of intimidation, and that all international human rights obligations important for successful elections, such as rights to freedom of expression, press, association and peaceful assembly, are respected, protected and fulfilled.

Further, we urge the Royal Government of Cambodia to refrain from using judicial, administrative and fiscal measures as political tools against the opposition, the media, civil society and human rights defenders and to further revise: the Law on Associations and NGOs (LANGO); the Law on Trade Unions; the Cambodian Criminal Code; and recent amendments to the Constitution. The political environment must be one in which opposition parties, civil society and media can function are able to carry out their legitimate roles without fear, threats or arbitrary restrictions.

We were heartened by the UN Special Rapporteur on Cambodia’s country visit that took place from 5-14 March.  We strongly encourage the government of Cambodia to pay close attention to the Special Rapporteur’s recommendations from her recent visit. In this regard, we urge Cambodia to take all necessary measures to prevent and deter acts of intimidate and reprisals against those cooperating with the UN human rights mechanisms, including human rights defenders and other civil society actors. We stand ready to support the implementation of assistance that will strengthen Cambodia’s democratic systems.

We urge the continued attention of the international community to the current situation in Cambodia, and we will look to further consideration by the Human Rights Council if the human rights situation does not improve in the lead up to the elections in July. We encourage the High Commissioner for Human Rights to provide an update on the situation in Cambodia in an inter-sessional briefing ahead of the June session of the Human Rights Council.

As Cambodia continues along the path of development, we urge the government to fulfill human rights obligations and commitments, in furtherance of a genuine liberal multi-party democracy as envisaged in the Constitution of Cambodia for the benefit of all Cambodians.

Thank you Mr. President.

New Zealand 3 New Zealand 4 New Zealand 5

 

 

More report by Reuters

Posted by: | Posted on: March 15, 2018

ការតស៊ូមតិដែលមានប្រសិទ្ធិភាពរបស់គណបក្សជំទាស់

ក្នុងយុគបច្ចុប្បន្ន ក្រសួងការបរទេសគឺភាគីសំខាន់បំផុតសម្រាប់រដ្ឋាភិបាលមួយក្នុងការការពារអំពើទាំងឡាយរបស់ខ្លួន។ ដូចគ្នាដែរ យន្តការមួយក្នុងយន្តការទាំងអស់សម្រាប់គណបក្សជំទាស់ ជាពិសេសគឺគណបក្សសង្គ្រោះជាតិដែលត្រូវបានគណបក្សដឹកនាំរាជរដ្ឋាភិបាលកំពុងធ្វើទុក្ខបុកម្នេញដូចបច្ចុប្បន្ននេះ ត្រូវប្រើប្រាស់យន្តការអន្តរជាតិអោយប្រសិទ្ធិភាពបំផុតទៅតាមដែលអាចធ្វើបាន។ ដូច្នេះតើគណបក្សជំទាស់ត្រូវធ្វើអ្វីខ្ល?

  1. យើងអាចនិយាយបានថាភាគីទាំងបីនេះ គឺរាជរដ្ឋាភិបាល គណបក្សប្រជាជន និងគណបក្សសង្គ្រោះជាតិ កន្លងមកទាំងសង្គមសុីវិល ទាំងសហគមន៍អន្តរជាតិ និងទាំងគណបក្សសង្គ្រោះជាតិ ហាក់ដូចជាបរាជ័យក្នុងការអប់រំប្រជាជនកម្ពុជាអោយយល់ថា គណបក្សប្រជាជនគឺជាគណបក្សដឹកនាំរាជរដ្ឋាភិបាល មិនមែនជាគណបក្សកម្មសិទ្ធិរបស់រាជរដ្ឋាភិបាលឬរាជរដ្ឋាភិបាលជាកម្មសិទ្ធិរបស់គណបក្សប្រជាជនទេ។ យោងតាមរដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញកម្ពុជាបច្ចុប្បន្ន គណបក្សនយោបាយគ្រាន់តែជាអ្នកដាក់វេនគ្នាមកដឹកនាំរាជរដ្ឋាភិបាលឬមកការពារប្រយោជន៍ជាតិតែប៉ុណ្ណោះ។ តែកន្លងមកលោកនាយករដ្ឋមន្ត្រីនិងមន្ត្រីគណបក្សប្រជាជនមួយចំនួនឈ្វេងយល់ថារាជរដ្ឋាភិបាលកម្ពុជាឬជាតិកម្ពុជាជាកម្មសិទ្ធិផ្តាច់មុខរបស់ខ្លួន មានជាឧទាហរណ៍ដូចជា៖ នាយករដ្ឋមន្ត្រីអៈអាងថាគាត់ជាអគ្គមេបញ្ជាការកងទ័ពទូរទាំងផ្ទៃប្រទេសដែលការនិយាយនេះហួសពីដែនសមត្ថកិច្ចរបស់រដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញ ស្ថាប័នព្រះមហាក្សត្រគឺឯករាជ្យនិងជាអ្នកការពារអធិបតេយ្យភាពក៏ដូចជារដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញកម្ពុជាប៉ុន្តែគណបក្សប្រជាជនបញ្ជូនមនុស្សរបស់ខ្លួនមកយាមព្រះរាជបល្លង្គគឺរដ្ឋមន្ត្រីក្រសួងព្រះបរមរាជវាំងហើយថវិការរបស់ព្រះរាជវាំងគឺក្តោបក្តាប់ដោយក្រសួងហិរញ្ញវត្ថុជាដើម តុលាការគឺជាស្ថាប័នឯករាជ្យចែងដោយរដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញប៉ុន្តែទាំងប្រធានតុលាការកំពូល(president of the supreme court)ទាំងព្រះរាជអាជ្ញា(executors)ទាំងចៅក្រម(judges)ជាដើមសុទ្ធសឹងតែជាសមាជិកអចិន្ត្រៃយ៍របស់គណបក្សប្រជាជនកម្ពុជាដែលនេះគឺផ្ទុយទាំងស្រុងទៅនឹងក្រមសីលធម៍(ethics) មុខវិជ្ជាជីវៈ(professionalism) និងជំលោះផលប្រយោជន៍(conflict of interest)ដូចមានចែងក្នុងច្បាប់។ ចំណែកស្ថាប័នឯករាជ្យមួយទៀតគឺស្ថាប័នរដ្ឋសភាព្រឹទ្ធសភាក៏មានការបង្កើតក្រសួងទំនាក់ទំនងរដ្ឋសភាអោយស្ថិតក្រោមទីស្តីការគណរដ្ឋមន្ត្រីដើម្បីគ្រប់គ្រងមិនអោយឯករាជ្យថែមទៀត។ ទាំងអស់េនះមិនរួមទាំងស្ថាប័នព្រះពុទ្ធសាសនា ស្ថាប័នមន្ត្រីរាជការទាំងសុីវិលនិងប្រដាប់អាវុធ និងទាំងស្ថាប័នឧត្តមសិក្សាទាំងរបស់រដ្ឋទាំងឯកជនដែលបានកំពុងប្រឡាក់ប្រឡូសទៅដោយការប្រទាញប្រទង់ពីគណបក្សប្រជាជនមិនអាចបំពេញការងារបំរើជាតិនិងប្រជាជនពិតប្រាកដបាន ។ល។និង។ល។
  2. ដើម្បីគាបសង្កត់ស្ថាប័នឯករាជ្យទាំងអស់នោះអោយមានប្រសិទ្ធិភាពថែមទៀត បច្ចុប្បន្នលោកហ៊ុន-សែន បានបង្កើតក្រុមក្រៅក្របខណ្ឌឬនិយាយអោយសាមញ្ញគឺក្រុមបាតដៃទី៣ដើម្បីគំរាមទាំងអ្នកជំទាស់ អ្នកស្ថិតក្នុងគណបក្សប្រជាជន និងអ្នកឯករាជ្យផ្សេងទៀត។ ជាឧទាហរណ៍  ក្រុមអ្នកវាយតំណាងរាស្ត្រនៅមុខរដ្ឋសភាក៏ដូចជាក្រុមប្រជាការពារដែលស្ថិតនៅក្រោមចៅសង្កាត់មេឃុំរបស់គណបក្សប្រជាជនកម្ពុជាត្រូវបានគេមើលឃើញថាអាជ្ញាធរមិនអាចប៉ៈពាល់តាមប្រព័ន្ធច្បាប់បានទេ។
  3. គណបក្សជំទាស់ត្រូវបង្កើនប្រសិទ្ធិភាពការតស៊ូមតិរបស់ខ្លួនដោយក្រៅពីជំហានដំបូងៗដូចជាផ្អាកទិដ្ឋាការនិងរឹបអូសទ្រព្យសម្បត្តិមន្ត្រីពុករលួយរំលោភសិទ្ធិមនុស្ស ការនិយាយអោយច្បាស់ៗថាអាស៊ានត្រូវទាត់ចោលសមាជិកភាពកម្ពុជាចេញ អង្គការសហប្រជាជាតិត្រូវទុកទំនេរចោលនូវអាសនៈកម្ពុជាចេញ សហគមអុឺរ៉ុបត្រូវដកសិទ្ធិនាំចេញពិសេសលើកលែងតែអាវុធចេញ(everything but arms or EBA) ហើយសហរដ្ឋអាមេរិកនិងអូស្ត្រាលីត្រូវដើរតួនាទីសំខាន់ក្នុងការស្តារឡើងវិញនូវកិច្ចព្រមព្រៀងសន្តិភាពទីក្រុងប៉ារីសជាដើម។
  4. សព្វថ្ងៃតាមរយៈក្រសួងការបរទេស លោកប្រាក់-សុខុនគាត់គឺកំពុងនាំកម្ពុជាទៅរកនយោបាយការបរទេសបរាជ័យនិងអសោចបំផុតមួយដូចលោកអៀង-សារីដូច្នោះដែរ។ ជាក់ស្តែង ក្នុងជំនួបជាមួយអ្នកស្រីរ៉ូណាស្មីត លោកប្រាក់-សុខុនបានត្រឹមខិតខំការពារកំហុសខ្លួនដែលថាដើម្បីការពារសន្តិភាពនៅពេលដែលអ្នកស្រីស្មីតសង្កត់ធ្ងន់ថាសិទ្ធិមនុស្សនិងយុត្តិធម៍គឺជាគ្រឹៈរបស់សន្តិភាពពិតប្រាកដ។ លោកប្រាក់-សុខនរត់ទៅពឹងចិនក្រោមការជាប់ក្អែលវៀតណាម ហើយព្យាយាមបំភ្លៃពត៍មានដូចជាលទ្ធផលក្រោយកិច្ចប្រជុំជាមួយអុឺរ៉ុបកាលពីថ្ងៃទី១៤ ខែមីនា ឆ្នាំ២០១៨នេះ ជាការគួរអោយចង់សើច នៅពេលដែលអុឺរ៉ុបប្រាប់អោយស្តារស្ថានការណ៍ឡើងវិញដោយការដោះលែងលោកកឹម-សុខា អ្នកទោសនយោបាយទាំងអស់ និងអោយមានវត្តមានគណបក្សសង្គ្រោះជាតិចូលរួមបោះឆ្នោត តែក្រសួងការបរទេសបែរនិយាយថាអុឺរ៉ុបសហការណ៍ល្អជាមួយកម្ពុជានិងចូលរួមគាំទ្រការបោះឆ្នោតខាងមុខនេះ។

ជាសរុប លោកនាយករដ្ឋមន្ត្រីនិងគណបក្សរបស់គាត់បានត្រឹមបំភ្លៃពត៍មានមិនពិតដើម្បីប្រជាភិថុតិប្រជាជនកម្ពុជា យុវជនកម្ពុជនកម្ពុជាមួយចំនួន និងក្រុមមានផលប្រយោជន៍(PIGs)របស់គាត់តែប៉ុណ្ណោះ តែមិនអាចបិទបាំងអ្នកបោះឆ្នោតដែលចង់អោយមានការផ្លាស់ប្តូរនិងសហគមន៍អន្តរជាតិបានទេ។

In this era, Ministry of Foreign Affairs is very essential agent to prevent all actions of their government. In the same time, one of the mechanisms for opposition party that has been dissolved by the Cambodia’s People Party must use the international mechanisms effectively. Therefore, how could the opposition implement?

United Nations Human Rights Council Geneva, 26 February – 23 March 2018 EU Statement – Item 4: Human Rights situation that require the Council’s attention

Mr. President,

Bruzel Statement 1I have the honour to speak on behalf of the European Union.

The Candidate Countries, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia[*], Montenegro* and Albania*, and the EFTA country Liechtenstein, member of the European Economic Area, align themselves with this statement.

As we celebrate the 70th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights this year, the European Union reiterates its strong commitment to the promotion and protection of human rights, emphasizing the role of the HRC as an important early warning tool, and welcomes this opportunity to discuss human rights situations that require the Council’s attention. With regard to the situation in DPRK, IranMyanmar/BurmaEritreaSyria, Burundi and South Sudan we would like to refer to our statements during the respective interactive dialogues.

The EU remains deeply concerned about the continuing deterioration of the political and human rights situation in Cambodia and the escalating repression of the opposition, civil society and the media. The EU reiterates its call for the immediate release of opposition leader Kem Sokha. The enforced dissolution of the main opposition party (CNRP) is a significant step away from the path of pluralism and democracy enshrined in Cambodia’s constitution. The EU reiterates that an electoral process from which the main opposition party has been arbitrarily excluded is not legitimate. The EU reiterates its call for the swift reversal of the dissolution of the CNRP and for the reinstatement of all CNRP members of parliament and CNRP local counsellors. The EU also expects the government to allow civil society organisations to fulfil their legitimate role.

Bruzel Statement 2While acknowledging the progress made on a number of areas of social and economic rights in China, the EU is concerned about detentions and trials of human rights defenders and lawyers Wang Quanzhang, Li Yuhan, Huang Qi, Yu Wensheng, Wu Gan and Tashi Wangchuk. The EU urges China to release all detained human rights defenders and to thoroughly investigate reported cases of mistreatment and torture while in detention. The EU is also concerned about the continued detention of the Swedish citizen Gui Minhai. The EU demands that he be allowed to meet Swedish diplomatic and medical staff and that he be released. The EU calls upon China to respect the rights of freedom of expression offline and online, and of religion, as well as cultural diversity, not least in Tibet and Xinjiang.

The EU remains deeply concerned about the high number of killings associated with the campaign against illegal drugs in the Philippines. The EU emphasizes the importance of carrying out the campaign with a focus on public health and in full compliance with due process, national law and international human rights law. It is imperative to conduct prompt, effective, impartial and transparent investigations of all cases of death leading to prosecution in all cases of unlawful killing.

On Venezuela, the EU is seriously concerned about the continued weakening of and non-respect for democratic institutions, the repression of political opponents and the obstacles to the opposition’s equal participation in elections. The adoption by the constituent assembly (not recognized Bruzel Statement 3by the EU and other international partners) of the “Law against Hatred” risks  further restricting the freedom of expression and opinion. The EU is also concerned about persistent  arbitrary detentions, reports of extrajudicial killings and widespread violations of the rights to food and to healthcare. The EU calls on the Venezuelan government to uphold people’s fundamental rights and freedoms, to facilitate external assistance to meet the pressing needs of the population, to release political prisoners, to respect democratic institutions and to ensure that elections are constitutional, transparent, credible and inclusive.

The EU recognizes Egypt’s efforts to combat terrorism and recalls the need to tackle it in full respect of international human rights standards and fundamental freedoms.  The EU continues to call on Egypt to respect rights to freedom of opinion and expression offline and online, including for journalists and bloggers, and of freedom of assembly and association and to stop applying disproportionate legislation limiting them and unduly restricting space for civil society organisations. The EU calls on Egypt to continue their efforts to shed light on the circumstances of the death of the Italian citizen Giulio Regeni and the French citizen Eric Lang and bring about justice. The EU is concerned about the recent increase in death sentences and executions in Egypt and calls on Egypt to suspend the issuance and implementation of the death penalty.

Read More …